Not long ago, when talking about the supervision of state-owned enterprise managers, Li Rongrong, director of the SASAC, pointed out that CEOs have to change positions when they are not in the state. This sounds unique and well-informed. It is worth considering.
The veterans of state-owned enterprises have made major problems, and it is easy to investigate and administer them by law. How to screen and how to investigate and deal with state-owned company CEOs is not an easy task. What kind of work attitude is "not in the state?" Director Li did not elaborate. The subjective analysis of the author, in addition to work, or even dereliction of duty crimes, the main energy is not always on the work of the company is not considered it? If not, it seems that can not be justified; if counted, then some bosses are always busy throughout the year Wenshanhuihai, welcome How do you say that you have to send in or visit and communicate? There are still some CEOs who are quick to work on the project according to the directives of the local government. In the end, they have no market value. What causes the country’s investment to go awry and the company’s huge losses? The CEOs contributed a pile of gratifying GDP figures, but they were polluted. How do people say that they complain? Obviously, “not in a state†is the “much-occurring disease†and “common disease†of the CEOs of state-owned enterprises. "It does not seem to be the boss. Sometimes, it is up to the bosses to be "in the state" with one heart and one mind and to act according to the laws of the market. On the contrary, they can easily cause the leaders to be unhappy. In other words, the problem of the “absent status†of some state-owned company executives actually exposes the unsatisfactory improvement of the performance evaluation system for state-owned enterprise managers, and the management mechanism of state-owned enterprises is not in the state of market economy. In a word, the operation and management mechanism of state-owned enterprises still does not completely break away from the "above all" framework. If you simply rely on the removal of the boss to solve the problem, it is tantamount to a headache, the foot pain.
The performance evaluation system and supervision mechanism for state-owned enterprises that meet the market economy must be based on the state-owned enterprise operating mechanism that is in line with the market economy. Otherwise, the bosses of state-owned enterprises are always inevitably in the business, their minds are "above", they are staring at the market with one eye, and they are staring at the leader's face in the other. It is not in any way "in the state." "of.
The veterans of state-owned enterprises have made major problems, and it is easy to investigate and administer them by law. How to screen and how to investigate and deal with state-owned company CEOs is not an easy task. What kind of work attitude is "not in the state?" Director Li did not elaborate. The subjective analysis of the author, in addition to work, or even dereliction of duty crimes, the main energy is not always on the work of the company is not considered it? If not, it seems that can not be justified; if counted, then some bosses are always busy throughout the year Wenshanhuihai, welcome How do you say that you have to send in or visit and communicate? There are still some CEOs who are quick to work on the project according to the directives of the local government. In the end, they have no market value. What causes the country’s investment to go awry and the company’s huge losses? The CEOs contributed a pile of gratifying GDP figures, but they were polluted. How do people say that they complain? Obviously, “not in a state†is the “much-occurring disease†and “common disease†of the CEOs of state-owned enterprises. "It does not seem to be the boss. Sometimes, it is up to the bosses to be "in the state" with one heart and one mind and to act according to the laws of the market. On the contrary, they can easily cause the leaders to be unhappy. In other words, the problem of the “absent status†of some state-owned company executives actually exposes the unsatisfactory improvement of the performance evaluation system for state-owned enterprise managers, and the management mechanism of state-owned enterprises is not in the state of market economy. In a word, the operation and management mechanism of state-owned enterprises still does not completely break away from the "above all" framework. If you simply rely on the removal of the boss to solve the problem, it is tantamount to a headache, the foot pain.
The performance evaluation system and supervision mechanism for state-owned enterprises that meet the market economy must be based on the state-owned enterprise operating mechanism that is in line with the market economy. Otherwise, the bosses of state-owned enterprises are always inevitably in the business, their minds are "above", they are staring at the market with one eye, and they are staring at the leader's face in the other. It is not in any way "in the state." "of.